Get Ready to File Your Income Tax Return

Prepare Early, Stay Accurate, and File ITR Smoothly for FY 2025–26

Book Tax Experts Today

File ITR-U for
linkedin
whatsapp

CGST Act Section 74: Tax Demand for Fraud Cases

Updated on: 22 Dec, 2025 12:23 PM

Section 74 of the CGST Act deals with cases where tax has not been paid, wrongly refunded, or ITC has been wrongly claimed with the intention to evade tax. It empowers the GST department to issue a demand notice and initiate proceedings in matters involving fraud or deliberate misstatement.

This article explains what Section 74 covers, how the notice process works, and the penalties involved.

Key Highlights

  • Section 74 of the CGST Act applies only to fraud and intentional tax evasion cases.
  • A demand notice must be issued within the time limits prescribed under GST law.
  • Taxpayers can settle the demand at different stages with reduced penalties.
  • Section 74 of CGST Act 2017 imposes higher penalties compared to Section 73 (non-fraud cases).
  • Wrongful ITC claims are a major area of action under this section.
  • Case laws continue to shape how authorities interpret fraud and intent.

What is Section 74 of the CGST Act?

Section 74 of the CGST Act 2017 deals with cases where a taxpayer knowingly evades GST. It covers:

  • Non-payment of GST
  • Short payment of GST
  • Wrong availment or utilisation of Input Tax Credit
  • Obtaining a refund by fraud
  • Misclassification, suppression of facts or falsified records

The key element that triggers action under Section 74 is intent to defraud the government. This distinguishes it from Section 73, which applies to unintentional and genuine mistakes.


Applicability of Section 74 in FY 2024-25?

For FY 2024-25, Section 74 remains applicable in cases involving:

  • Fraudulent ITC claims made through fake invoices
  • Shell companies created for issuing fake bills
  • Manipulation of turnover to reduce GST liability
  • Misreporting of outward supplies
  • Wrong refund claims

With increased digitisation and data matching by GSTN, the department is actively issuing notices under Section 74 for mismatch cases, especially relating to GSTR-3B vs. GSTR-2A/2B.


Time Limit of Section 74 of the CGST Act

The department must issue the notice within the following timelines:

  • 5 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year
    or
  • 5 years from the date of the erroneous refund

This is longer than the 3-year limit provided under Section 73 because cases under Section 74 involve fraud.

The order must be issued at least 6 months before the expiry of the limitation period.


Procedure for Issuing a Notice Under Section 74

The process generally includes the following steps:

1. Detection of Potential Fraud

Through data analytics, audits, inspections or third-party information, officers detect discrepancies.

2. Issue of Show Cause Notice (SCN)

The department issues a detailed SCN explaining:

  • The alleged fraud
  • Tax amount short-paid or wrongly availed
  • Evidence collected
  • Penalty proposed

3. Opportunity for Reply

The taxpayer can submit explanations and documents to defend the case.

4. Personal Hearing

A hearing is granted before a final order is passed.

5. Final Order

The officer issues the final order confirming the demand if the explanation is not satisfactory.


Options Available for Taxpayers Regarding Demand Notice u/s 74

To reduce penalties and close the matter early, the law provides settlement options:

Before SCN

  • Pay full tax + interest + 15% penalty
  • No SCN will be issued thereafter.

Within 30 Days of SCN

  • Pay full tax + interest + 25% penalty
  • Proceedings will be concluded.

Within 30 Days of Final Order

  • Pay full tax + interest + 50% penalty
  • No further recovery proceedings.

If the taxpayer pays beyond this period, the full penalty of 100% applies.


Section 74 of the CGST Act Penalty

Penalties under Section 74 are stringent:

  • Minimum penalty: 15% (when paid voluntarily before SCN)
  • After SCN: 25%
  • After order: 50%
  • Maximum penalty for non-payment: 100% of the tax amount

The penalty structure is designed to discourage fraudulent practices and encourage early settlement.


Input Tax Credit Under Section 74

Wrong availing or utilising of ITC is one of the most common triggers for notices under Section 74 of the CGST Act.

Cases typically include:

  • ITC taken on fake invoices
  • ITC claimed without receipt of goods/services
  • ITC claimed on ineligible items
  • Mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/2B

Some key judgments that guide the application of Section 74 include:

1. Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Union of India

The court held that ITC must be backed by valid invoices and actual receipt of goods/services.

2. M/s NKAS Services Pvt. Ltd.

Emphasised that fraud must be proven with evidence; mere mismatch cannot automatically lead to penalties under Section 74.

3. Suncraft Energy Pvt. Ltd.

Highlighted that suppression of facts or falsified records can directly attract Section 74 proceedings.

4. Fake Invoice Cases

Multiple high-court judgments support strict action under Section 74 for fake ITC claims.

These decisions underline that intent is a crucial factor in invoking Section 74 of the CGST Act 2017.

Need help with GST registration or GST filing? Get in touch with our GST experts who can not only help you register and file your GST, but also assist with GST notice assistance. Connect with an expert today!


FAQs on Section 74 of CGST Act

Q- What is Section 74 of the CGST Act?

It deals with cases of tax evasion involving fraud, suppression of facts or intentional misstatements.


Q- How is Section 74 different from Section 73?

Section 73 applies to genuine errors, whereas Section 74 applies to intentional fraud.


Q- What is the time limit to issue a notice under Section 74?

A notice must be issued within 5 years from the due date of the annual return for that year.


Q- Can a taxpayer settle the case before receiving an SCN?

Yes, by paying tax + interest + 15% penalty, the taxpayer can close the matter without an SCN.


Q- What happens if I ignore a Section 74 notice?

The department may issue an order with a 100% penalty, start recovery, and even initiate prosecution in serious cases.


Q- Is ITC reversal compulsory under Section 74?

Yes. Wrongly availed ITC must be reversed with interest and penalty.


Q- Can I appeal against an order under Section 74?

Yes, orders can be appealed before the Appellate Authority.


Q- Does mismatch between GSTR-2A/2B and GSTR-3B always mean fraud?

No. Fraud must be established with evidence. Minor mismatches are generally treated under Section 73.


Q- What documents should I keep ready to respond to a Section 74 notice?

Invoices, delivery proofs, e-way bills, payment proofs, agreements, and reconciliation statements.


CA Abhishek Soni

CA Abhishek Soni
Founder & CEO at Tax2win

Abhishek Soni is a Chartered Accountant by profession and an entrepreneur by passion. He has wide industry experience in telecom, retail, manufacturing, and entertainment and has handled various national and international assignments. He is the co-founder and CEO of Tax2win.in. Tax2win, an online tax filing platform, provides the easiest way to e-file your Income Tax Return in India. Through Tax2win.in, Abhishek endeavors to revolutionize how individuals file their income tax returns, offering a seamless and user-friendly experience.